<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Persistence on Own The Leap</title><link>https://owntheleap.com/tags/persistence/</link><description>Recent content in Persistence on Own The Leap</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://owntheleap.com/tags/persistence/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>After the Third Note</title><link>https://owntheleap.com/posts/after-the-third-note/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://owntheleap.com/posts/after-the-third-note/</guid><description>&lt;p>I wrote the Marcus email yesterday afternoon, as I said I would. Sent at 3:41pm.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>It was seventy-two words. I know that because I counted them after I hit send, which tells you something about the quality of my confidence.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The first Marcus note introduced me without a badge, which I had decided was a significant thing to figure out. The second was a follow-up, which I have done a thousand times in various directions. The third one I have no good name for. It was not clever. It did not have a new angle. I said: I have followed up once. I am not certain this is the right moment or the right ask. But the idea I wrote about in October is still the idea I think matters, and I would like to know if you want to talk about it. I will take no for an answer.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>