<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Attorney on Own The Leap</title><link>https://owntheleap.com/tags/attorney/</link><description>Recent content in Attorney on Own The Leap</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://owntheleap.com/tags/attorney/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Email I Held for Thirty-One Hours</title><link>https://owntheleap.com/posts/the-email-i-held/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://owntheleap.com/posts/the-email-i-held/</guid><description>&lt;p>The attorney meeting lasted 43 minutes. I had planned for an hour.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>She went through the non-solicitation clause quickly. I found that efficient, and then noticed I was reading efficiency as reassurance, which is not quite the same thing. The missing exhibit, the Restricted Clients list referenced in my agreement but not attached to my copy, turns out to work somewhat in my favor: a clause that points to a list it doesn&amp;rsquo;t include is harder to enforce than it reads on the page. She recommended I request the exhibit from HR anyway. I wrote that down.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>