What Clarity Earns You

I named the target correctly. The inbox doesn't care. Sitting with what clarity is actually worth when there's no mechanism to feed it into.

Leigh Sutton
Leigh Sutton Corporate lifer. Aspiring free agent. 3 min read
A mug of coffee on a rustic wooden table, perfect for a cozy moment or reading session.
Photo by Jessica Lewis 🦋 thepaintedsquare on Pexels

It’s Friday, October 30.

I know it is Friday because I looked at the calendar. For 24 years, Friday arrived on its own. There was a texture to it: the week releasing, a small tidal thing, even in the bad years, even when I was carrying something I did not want to be carrying. Friday meant the same house for 48 hours instead of seven hours on video calls and the low background hum of what was still left to do. I organized myself around that rhythm without noticing. I noticed when it was gone.

Now Thursday and Friday are mostly the same thing. The dog still needs walking at the same time. Max still leaves at 7:15 with the lacrosse equipment. The coffee still takes four minutes. The rhythm is domestic, not professional, and it turns out the professional one was the one I had built my sense of the week around for 24 years.

Except this week, Friday means tomorrow is November 1.


I named the target accurately yesterday, I think. Five conversations by November 1 was a container. A thing with a date and a number so I could feel like I was aiming at something while the emails sat in other people’s inboxes. I see that now. I saw it yesterday. I see it today, Friday morning, one day before it expires.

The inbox has four new emails. One from my mother, one newsletter, one from the homeowner’s association about the parking strip. Zero from any of the nine contacts in the log.

What I have been discovering, slowly and not with enthusiasm, is that seeing something clearly does not change what you are seeing. At work, clarity had a mechanism. You named the situation accurately in the right meeting, the meeting produced a decision, the decision moved the thing. I got very good at that sequence. The accurate reading was worth something because it fed into something.

There is no meeting now. There is a contact log and a Friday morning and an inbox with three unrelated emails.


I am not in despair. I want to say that plainly and not wrap too much reassurance around it. What I am is unsettled in a specific way: I have been accurate about situations for 24 years and the accuracy has always been worth something. It got me into rooms. It kept me in them. Reading things right mattered because reading things right fed a mechanism.

Right now I am reading things right and it leads to sitting in a chair, waiting for other people to check their email.

Maybe this is just what the first months are. Not the failure of clarity. The discovery that clarity is a description, not a currency. Naming things correctly is better than not naming them. I believe that. I just kept expecting the description to produce something, the way it always had. Named problem, meeting, decision, action. I have the named problem. The rest of the sequence requires other people to do their part, which is not something I can control, which I understand, and which I have understood for weeks, and which does not get easier to understand every morning.


Every container I have built since March has done its job before it expired. The backward map. The attorney consultation. The resignation notice. The contact log. Each one held something while I needed it held.

The November 1 container expires tomorrow. I have not figured out what to build next. I said yesterday I cannot resolve whether the next target I build will be smarter or just different. I thought about it all of Thursday. I still can’t.

What I have not let myself fully picture is Saturday morning. The date arriving. The container emptied. What I do with the morning after.