Forty Minutes of Prep

The one-on-one went fine. Better than fine. What I am less sure about is what it means to keep being this good at something I am leaving.

Leigh Sutton
Leigh Sutton Corporate lifer. Aspiring free agent. 4 min read
McCafe branded coffee cup on a modern office desk, creating a relaxed work ambiance.
Photo by Erik Mclean on Pexels

The one-on-one with my manager was at ten. I prepped for it last night, which I knew I would do the moment I saw it on the calendar. Quarterly account summary, three items that needed his awareness, two decisions I wanted documented before they got attributed to nobody in particular. Forty minutes of prep for a thirty-minute meeting. The ratio is about right.

It went fine. Better than fine. The accounts are in good shape. I had the numbers. He asked two follow-up questions, both reasonable, and I had answers for both. The meeting ended two minutes early. He said something about a strong Q3 setup. I said thanks. The screen went dark.

I sat there for a minute after, the way you sit in a parked car.


The thing I have been noticing about these meetings lately: I am better at them than I have ever been. Not better at the content, though that too. Better at the reading of them.

I can track three things simultaneously now. What is being said. What is being avoided. What the other person thinks they are accomplishing with the conversation. This is not a new skill. I have had it for twenty-four years, sharpened across four companies and more quarterly reviews than I can count. What is different now is that I am not using it for the meeting. I am using it to watch the meeting happen.

I stopped being inside these conversations sometime this spring. I am not sure exactly when. What I am inside of now is the observation of them. I keep expecting this to bother me more than it does.


Last night I spent forty minutes preparing for the meeting with my manager and approximately zero preparing for the conversation I have been naming in this space five times without yet opening it.

I noticed this at about 9:30, which is when I picked up my phone for twenty minutes, which tells me something.

My manager’s meeting I know how to be in. I know what the silences mean and which follow-up questions are real and what he needs from a thirty-minute quarterly check-in. The prep is almost a formality. I do it anyway because I was raised to show up having done the work, and because documentation is its own kind of protection.

The other conversation I do not know how to be in. I don’t know what shape it has, or what I need from it, or what the silences are going to mean. I named the account management logic here two days ago. Readiness comes from inside the thing, not before it. That is true. I learned it from accounts, not from people I love. I am not entirely sure it transfers the same way.


There was a moment about halfway through the meeting. My manager made a reference to “where things are headed in Q4,” and something in his voice registered differently than it usually does. He did not say anything unusual. He said exactly what he would say. But I wrote a note afterward that I would not have written a year ago.

He is managing around something he does not want to name. Budget, probably. Possibly a reorg. Something in the category of things that get managed around when the fiscal picture shifts. I have seen this shape enough times to recognize it without needing the specifics.

A year ago I would have spent twenty minutes after the meeting trying to get ahead of it, adjusting my positioning, figuring out which of my accounts needed extra attention before something changed above me. Today I wrote the note, closed the document, and went to get more coffee.

I am not sure if this is clarity or just distance. The fact that I cannot tell does not particularly bother me, which is itself a kind of information.


September 19 is thirty-nine days away. Not that I am counting. I am counting.

My manager does not know this. The meeting we had today happened in the context of information he is not in possession of. I am not sure what to do with that, exactly. I gave him a real quarterly update. The numbers are real. The accounts are in good shape. What I am not doing is telling him what else is true, which is not lying exactly, but it is a large gap to carry into a thirty-minute meeting.

I imagine I will keep being good at the one-on-ones until the one I cannot be good at anymore. There is something true in that sentence. I am still figuring out what.